Legend:
CC = Vancouver Convention Centre
F = Fairmont Waterfront Vancouver
* = applied session ! = JSM meeting theme
|
|
|
|
314
|
Tue, 7/31/2018,
9:25 AM -
10:10 AM
|
CC-West Hall B
|
|
SPEED: Missing Survey Data: Analysis, Imputation, Design, and Prevention — Contributed Poster Presentations
|
|
Survey Research Methods Section, Government Statistics Section
|
|
Chair(s): Paul McNicholas, McMaster University
|
|
Oral Presentations
for this session.
|
|
1:
|
Estimating Survey Attrition Phases Using Change-Point Models
Camille Hochheimer, Virginia Commonwealth University; Roy T Sabo, Virginia Commonwealth University; Alex H Krist, Virginia Commonwealth University
|
|
2:
|
Census Efforts to Reduce the Undercount of Young Children
Gina Walejko, U.S. Census Bureau; Scott Konicki, U.S. Census Bureau
|
|
3:
|
Is There a 'safe Area' Where the Nonresponse Rate Has Only a Modest Effect on Bias Despite Non-Ignorable Nonresponse?
Dan Hedlin, Stockholm university
|
|
4:
|
Design-Based Alternative Calibration Weighting Under Nonresponse in Survey Sampling
Per Andersson, Stockholm University
|
|
5:
|
A Simulation Study to Evaluate How Sample Weight Adjustment with Prevalence Calibration for the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) Affects Nonresponse Bias
Te-Ching Chen, CDC/NCHS; Jennifer Parker, CDC/NCHS; Tala Fakhouri, CDC/NCHS
|
|
6:
|
Degrees of Freedom in Multiple Imputation: The Original vs. The Adjusted in 2015 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey
Qiyuan Pan, CDC/NCHS/DHCS; Rong Wei, National Center for Health Statistics
|
|
7:
|
Nonresponse Bias Studies for Department of Defense Surveys
Eric Falk, Department of Defense/Office of People Analytics
|
|
8:
|
Exploring Reminder Calls Intended to Increase Interviewer Compliance with Data Collection Protocols
Amanda Nagle, U.S. Census Bureau; Kevin Tolliver, U.S. Census Bureau
|
|
9:
|
Effect of the Survey Name on Response Rates and Survey Estimates
David McGrath, Department of Defense Office of People Analytics
|
|
10:
|
Early Bird Gets the Worm? Effects of Differential Incentives on Mode Choice and Response Rates
Patricia LeBaron, RTI International; Nathaniel Taylor, RTI International; Leah Fiacco, RTI International; Melissa Helton, RTI International; Amy Henes, RTI International; Stephen King, RTI International
|
|
11:
|
Nonresponse Bias Analysis for the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey
Kirk Wolter, NORC at the University of Chicago; Ying Li, NORC at the University of Chicago; Whitney Murphy, NORC at the University of Chicago
|
|
12:
|
Using Predictive Modeling in Survey Methodology to Identify Panel Nonresponse
Bernd Weiss, GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences; Jan-Philipp Kolb, GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences; Christoph Kern, University of Mannheim
|
|
13:
|
Does Sequence of Imputed Variables Matter in Hot Deck Imputation for Large-Scale Complex Survey Data?
Amang Sukasih, RTI International; Peter Frechtel, RTI International; Karol Krotki, RTI International
|
|
14:
|
Tree-Based Doubly-Robust Nonparametric Multiple Imputation
Darryl Creel
|
|
15:
|
Multiple Imputation Methods Addressing Planned Missingness in a Multi-Phase Survey
Irina Bondarenko, University of Michigan; Yun Li, University of Michigan; Paul Imbriano, University of Michigan
|
|
16:
|
Outcomes of Suicide Risk Assessment and Safety Planning in a Longitudinal Mixed Mode Survey of Patients with Complex Psychiatric Disorders
Danna Moore, Washington State University-Social & Economic Science Research Center; John Fortney, University of Washington, School of Medicine; Dan Vakoch, Washington State Univesity-Social and Economic Sciences Research Center
|
|
17:
|
"You're Not From Around Here, Are You?" How Regional Accent Affects Survey Cooperation
Matt Jans, ICF; James Dayton, ICF; Matt McDonough, ICF
|
|
18:
|
Imputation of Small Number of New Questions in the Large Survey
Di Xiong, UCLA SPH; Yan Wang, Field School of Public Health, UCLA; Honghu Liu, UCLA
|
