eventscribe

The eventScribe Educational Program Planner system gives you access to information on sessions, special events, and the conference venue. Take a look at hotel maps to familiarize yourself with the venue, read biographies of our plenary speakers, and download handouts and resources for your sessions.

close this panel
‹‹ Go Back

Xinkai Zhou

University of California, Los Angeles



‹‹ Go Back

Ronghui Xu

University of California, San Diego



‹‹ Go Back

David Elashoff

University of California, Los Angeles



‹‹ Go Back

Please enter your access key

The asset you are trying to access is locked for premium users. Please enter your access key to unlock.


Email This Presentation:

From:

To:

Subject:

Body:

←Back IconGems-Print

243 – Contributed Poster Presentations: Biopharmaceutical Section

Local Odds Ratio Is More Efficient Than Correlation Coefficient for Modeling Longitudinal Ordinal Data

Sponsor: Biometrics Section
Keywords: Longitudinal Ordinal Data, Proportional Odds Cumulative Logit Model, Generalized Estimating Equations, Local Odds Ratio

Xinkai Zhou

University of California, Los Angeles

Ronghui Xu

University of California, San Diego

David Elashoff

University of California, Los Angeles

While correlation coefficient is commonly used for parameterizing the "working" correlation structure in generalized estimating equations (GEE) for modeling longitudinal ordinal data using the proportional odds cumulative logit model, it is well known that its range is severely constrained as a result of the Frechet bound. Although alternative parameterizations have been proposed, a direct comparison between them is lacking. Consequently, analysts usually fall back to the correlation coefficient method as the default option even though they are aware of its potential problems. To inform modeling choice, this paper conducted a simulation study and found that the correlation coefficient approach is not optimal in a wide range of scenarios. In fact, we found that the local odds ratio approach can achieve up to 30% efficiency gains (in a sense that will be defined in the article) compared to the correlation coefficient approach.

"eventScribe", the eventScribe logo, "CadmiumCD", and the CadmiumCD logo are trademarks of CadmiumCD LLC, and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from CadmiumCD. The appearance of these proceedings, customized graphics that are unique to these proceedings, and customized scripts are the service mark, trademark and/or trade dress of CadmiumCD and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written notification. All other trademarks, slogans, company names or logos are the property of their respective owners. Reference to any products, services, processes or other information, by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, owner, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation thereof by CadmiumCD.

As a user you may provide CadmiumCD with feedback. Any ideas or suggestions you provide through any feedback mechanisms on these proceedings may be used by CadmiumCD, at our sole discretion, including future modifications to the eventScribe product. You hereby grant to CadmiumCD and our assigns a perpetual, worldwide, fully transferable, sublicensable, irrevocable, royalty free license to use, reproduce, modify, create derivative works from, distribute, and display the feedback in any manner and for any purpose.

© 2017 CadmiumCD