Online Program Home
  My Program

All Times EDT

Abstract Details

Activity Number: 395 - Addressing Individual Variation to Improve the Analysis of Forensic Evidence
Type: Invited
Date/Time: Thursday, August 12, 2021 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Advisory Committee on Forensic Science
Abstract #316936
Title: What Can We Learn from Proficiency Testing at Forensic Laboratories
Author(s): Robin Mejia*
Companies: Carnegie Mellon University
Keywords: proficiency test; forensic science
Abstract:

Regular proficiency testing of examiners is required at accredited forensic laboratories. Proficiency test results are sometimes treated as a proxy for error rates in legal proceedings, even though they were not designed with that goal. Commercial forensic proficiency tests have been shown to differ substantially from casework, in terms of tasks and difficulty. Some laboratories, primarily federal forensic facilities, have adopted blind proficiency tests. Blind tests offer advantages. They must resemble actual cases, can test the entire laboratory pipeline, and avoid changes in behavior from an examiner knowing they are being tested. While not a substitute for error rate studies or foundational research in specific disciplines, blind proficiency tests provide better data on both analyst performance and forensic techniques. Blind proficiency tests are mandatory in the medical and drug testing industries. However, in 2014, only 10 percent of forensic laboratories were using blind proficiency tests, compared to 20 percent in 2002. This presentation discusses the obstacles to blind testing in forensic laboratories and what can be gained by implementing it.


Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2021 program