JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #301989

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 212
Type: Topic Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Section on Bayesian Statistical Science
Abstract - #301989
Title: Propensity Score Estimation with Boosted Regression
Author(s): Daniel F. McCaffrey*+ and Greg Ridgeway and Andrew Morral
Companies: RAND Corporation and RAND Corporation and RAND Corporation
Address: 201 North Craig St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15090,
Keywords: causal effect ; bagging ; generalized boosting ; regression trees
Abstract:

Causal effect modeling with naturalistic, rather than experimental, data is challenging. Variations in treatment exposure may be confounded with differences in pretreatment characteristics or treatment selection factors. Propensity score methods can theoretically eliminate these confounds for all observed covariates, but accurate estimation of propensity scores is impeded by large numbers of covariates, uncertain functional forms for their associations with treatment selection, and other problems. This paper demonstrates that boosting, a modern statistical technique, can overcome many of these obstacles. We use generalized boosting regression, which maximizes a likelihood function rather than minimizing prediction error. We report the mean-squared error of estimated treatment resulting from alternative stopping rules for the boosting algorithm including methods based on out-of-bag cross-validation and minimization of the imbalance of covariate distributions between groups. We illustrate this approach with a study of adolescent probationers in substance abuse treatment programs. Propensity score weights estimated using boosting eliminated all large pre-treatment group differences.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004