Abstract #302403

This is the preliminary program for the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings in San Francisco, California. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 2-5, 2003); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2003 Program page



JSM 2003 Abstract #302403
Activity Number: 4
Type: Invited
Date/Time: Sunday, August 3, 2003 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Business & Economics Statistics Section
Abstract - #302403
Title: Racial Discrimination in Home Purchase Mortgage Lending Among Large National Banks
Author(s): Todd Vermilyea*+ and McKinley Blackburn
Companies: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and University of South Carolina
Address: 10 Independence Mall, Philadelphia, PA, 19106,
Keywords: Discrimination ; Disparate Impact ; Disparate Treatment
Abstract:

Statistical models of mortgage lending underwriting have been used by bank regulators to assist in enforcing fair lending laws for the past several years. In general, these bank specific models have not produced evidence of discrimination, a finding that appears to be at odds with the well-known conclusion of the Boston Fed study. In this paper, we combine data from several bank-specific models constructed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to obtain a single measure of disparate treatment discrimination in the banking sector. Our estimates suggest that blacks (and, less conclusively, Hispanics) are less likely to receive loans, given stated criteria used by individual banks. Our estimated impact of race is smaller than that suggested in the Boston Fed Study, which is explained largely by their imposition of a single decision-making framework across all lending institutions. We show that earlier studies have likely overstated--by a significant magnitude--the degree of discrimination, as these studies utilized pooled rather than lender-specific models. Their common specification approach may reflect disparate impact discrimination, although the estimated effect of race in this kind of model can also reflect nondiscriminatory influences.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2003 program

JSM 2003 For information, contact meetings@amstat.org or phone (703) 684-1221. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2003