eventscribe

The eventScribe Educational Program Planner system gives you access to information on sessions, special events, and the conference venue. Take a look at hotel maps to familiarize yourself with the venue, read biographies of our plenary speakers, and download handouts and resources for your sessions.

close this panel

SUBMIT FEEDBACKfeedback icon

Please enter any improvements, suggestions, or comments for the JSM Proceedings.

Comments


close this panel
support

Technical Support


Phone: (410) 638-9239

Fax: (410) 638-6108

GoToMeeting: Meet Now!

Web: www.CadmiumCD.com

Submit Support Ticket


close this panel
‹‹ Go Back

Michael Jones

Westat



‹‹ Go Back

Please enter your access key

The asset you are trying to access is locked for premium users. Please enter your access key to unlock.


Email This Presentation:

From:

To:

Subject:

Body:

←Back IconGems-Print

285 – 285 - New Advances in Sample Design and Adjusting for Survey Nonresponse

Modeling Survey Nonresponse Under a Cluster Sample Design: Classification and Regression Tree Methodologies Compared

Sponsor:
Keywords: classification trees, clustering, nonresponse bias, response propensities, survey weights, weighting class adjustments

Michael Jones

Westat

When computing survey weights for use during the analysis of complex sample survey data, an adjustment for nonresponse is often performed to reduce the bias of the estimates. Many algorithms and methodologies are available to analysts for modeling survey nonresponse for these adjustments. Lohr et al. (2015) discussed the benefits of using classification trees for estimating response propensities in surveys and how these methods could be used to reduce nonresponse bias. Cecere et al. (2020) extended their findings and recommendations using expanded simulations for more complex sample designs, such as a stratified design with equal sample size allocation. This paper will compare select algorithms when working with a complex cluster sample design. We evaluate the effect of the classification tree-based methods on the reduction of nonresponse bias in high response and low response settings, and investigate the performance of the methods when they are used to adjust survey weights. We discuss the benefits and limitations of using these methods for estimating response propensities in surveys that utilize a cluster sample.

"eventScribe", the eventScribe logo, "Cadmium", and the Cadmium logo are trademarks of Cadmium LLC, and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from Cadmium. The appearance of these proceedings, customized graphics that are unique to these proceedings, and customized scripts are the service mark, trademark and/or trade dress of Cadmium and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written notification. All other trademarks, slogans, company names or logos are the property of their respective owners. Reference to any products, services, processes or other information, by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, owner, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation thereof by Cadmium.

As a user you may provide Cadmium with feedback. Any ideas or suggestions you provide through any feedback mechanisms on these proceedings may be used by Cadmium, at our sole discretion, including future modifications to the eventScribe product. You hereby grant to Cadmium and our assigns a perpetual, worldwide, fully transferable, sublicensable, irrevocable, royalty free license to use, reproduce, modify, create derivative works from, distribute, and display the feedback in any manner and for any purpose.

© 2021 Cadmium