support

Technical Support


Phone: (410) 638-9239

Fax: (410) 638-6108

GoToMeeting: Meet Now!

Web: www.CadmiumCD.com

Submit Support Ticket


close this panel
‹‹ Go Back

Gavin Corral

United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service



‹‹ Go Back

Tyler Wilson

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service



‹‹ Go Back

Andrew J. Dau

United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service



‹‹ Go Back

Please enter your access key

The asset you are trying to access is locked for premium users. Please enter your access key to unlock.


Email This Presentation:

From:

To:

Subject:

Body:

←Back IconGems-Print

135 – Nonresponse Adjustment and Weighting

Estimating Propensity of Survey Response by Mode Type Using Regression Trees

Sponsor: Survey Research Methods Section
Keywords: Survey Mode, Survey Response, Propensity, Regression Tree, Record Impact, Response Rates

Gavin Corral

United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Tyler Wilson

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service

Andrew J. Dau

United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) produces over 400 publications annually. NASS uses a process of estimating propensity score of a survey response that employs multiple data sources, including USDA agencies and the Census Bureau. In an effort to assist regional field offices (RFOs) and increase response rates, several new propensity score models of survey response and nonresponse were examined. After multiple modeling attempts using methods such as logistic regression, bootstrap forest, and boosted regression, the team determined that bootstrap forest models outperformed other methods. This paper outlines two models: Model 1 (more expensive) estimates the probability of response by field enumeration and; Model 2 (less expensive) estimates the probability of response by mail or computer assisted telephone interviewing (CATI). The potential for using these models with measures of impact as part of the data collection strategy to increase response rates of NASS surveys and increase overall data collection efficiency is discussed.

"eventScribe", the eventScribe logo, "CadmiumCD", and the CadmiumCD logo are trademarks of CadmiumCD LLC, and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from CadmiumCD. The appearance of these proceedings, customized graphics that are unique to these proceedings, and customized scripts are the service mark, trademark and/or trade dress of CadmiumCD and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written notification. All other trademarks, slogans, company names or logos are the property of their respective owners. Reference to any products, services, processes or other information, by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, owner, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation thereof by CadmiumCD.

As a user you may provide CadmiumCD with feedback. Any ideas or suggestions you provide through any feedback mechanisms on these proceedings may be used by CadmiumCD, at our sole discretion, including future modifications to the eventScribe product. You hereby grant to CadmiumCD and our assigns a perpetual, worldwide, fully transferable, sublicensable, irrevocable, royalty free license to use, reproduce, modify, create derivative works from, distribute, and display the feedback in any manner and for any purpose.

© 2018 CadmiumCD