eventscribe

The eventScribe Educational Program Planner system gives you access to information on sessions, special events, and the conference venue. Take a look at hotel maps to familiarize yourself with the venue, read biographies of our plenary speakers, and download handouts and resources for your sessions.

close this panel
‹‹ Go Back

JD Bunker

RTI International



‹‹ Go Back

Marcus Berzofsky

RTI International



‹‹ Go Back

Please enter your access key

The asset you are trying to access is locked for premium users. Please enter your access key to unlock.


Email This Presentation:

From:

To:

Subject:

Body:

←Back IconGems-Print

333 – SPEED: Biopharmaceutical Statistics, Medical Devices, and Mental Health

Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys: Accounting for Instrumentation Changes

Sponsor: Social Statistics Section
Keywords: measurement error, repeated cross-sectional survey, Survey of Prison Inmates

JD Bunker

RTI International

Marcus Berzofsky

RTI International

Repeated cross-sectional surveys try to maintain continuity in their instruments to allow for trend analysis. However, changes are necessary over time to adapt to improved methodology and to update to current circumstances. Changes may include certain questions being phrased differently across time, the addition or removal of particular response options, or the reorganization of the questions themselves. When conducting trend analysis in repeated cross-sectional surveys, it is necessary to account for potential measurement error spawning from such changes. The Survey of Prison Inmates (SPI) sponsored by the Bureau of Justice Statistics has been conducted seven times since 1974. The survey provides information about U.S. prisoners on a wide range of topics, such as demographics, current offenses and sentences, criminal history, gun possession and use, drug use and treatment, and mental health history and treatment. In this paper, we assess how similar constructs have changed in the SPI instrument over time and then discuss how those changes impact survey estimates and their comparability. Our analysis will specifically focus on comparing the most recent survey year, 2016, to the most recent prior version, 2004.

"eventScribe", the eventScribe logo, "CadmiumCD", and the CadmiumCD logo are trademarks of CadmiumCD LLC, and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from CadmiumCD. The appearance of these proceedings, customized graphics that are unique to these proceedings, and customized scripts are the service mark, trademark and/or trade dress of CadmiumCD and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written notification. All other trademarks, slogans, company names or logos are the property of their respective owners. Reference to any products, services, processes or other information, by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, owner, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation thereof by CadmiumCD.

As a user you may provide CadmiumCD with feedback. Any ideas or suggestions you provide through any feedback mechanisms on these proceedings may be used by CadmiumCD, at our sole discretion, including future modifications to the eventScribe product. You hereby grant to CadmiumCD and our assigns a perpetual, worldwide, fully transferable, sublicensable, irrevocable, royalty free license to use, reproduce, modify, create derivative works from, distribute, and display the feedback in any manner and for any purpose.

© 2017 CadmiumCD