‹‹ Go Back

Erica Yu

Bureau of Labor Statistics



‹‹ Go Back

Jennifer Edgar

Bureau of Labor Statistics



‹‹ Go Back

Brandon Kopp

Bureau of Labor Statistics



‹‹ Go Back

Brett McBride

Bureau of Labor Statistics



‹‹ Go Back

Please enter your access key

The asset you are trying to access is locked for premium users. Please enter your access key to unlock.


Email This Presentation:

From:

To:

Subject:

Body:

←Back IconGems-Print

67 – The Consumer Expenditure Survey Redesign: Development, Concept Testing, and Evaluation

Testing New Interview Protocols: Lessons Learned About Interviewers, Respondents, and Survey Content

Sponsor: Survey Research Methods Section
Keywords: Interview protocols, cognitive testing, questionnaire design

Erica Yu

Bureau of Labor Statistics

Jennifer Edgar

Bureau of Labor Statistics

Brandon Kopp

Bureau of Labor Statistics

Brett McBride

Bureau of Labor Statistics

The Gemini redesign proposal for the Consumer Expenditure Survey includes an emphasis on records to aid in the reporting of difficult-to-recall expenditures. Research was needed to understand how this new interview protocol would affect the length, burden, and respondent use of records during the interview. For this study, two new protocols were tested: 27 participants were assigned to a "respondent-track" protocol and 25 participants to an "interviewer-track" protocol. In the respondent-track protocol, participants determined the order of questioning and maintained control of records. In the interviewer-track protocol, interviewers followed a fixed order of questioning and controlled the records during the interview. Analyses show that participants in the respondent-track group reported significantly more of their expenses using records as compared to the participants in the interviewer-track group. This difference may be explained by two causes: an interviewer effect, whereby one interviewer had significantly less records usage than the other five interviewers; and more use of electronic records in the respondent-track group. And, qualitative feedback from participants emphasized the importance of advance communication for setting participant expectations and understanding of the interview content.

"eventScribe", the eventScribe logo, "CadmiumCD", and the CadmiumCD logo are trademarks of CadmiumCD LLC, and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from CadmiumCD. The appearance of these proceedings, customized graphics that are unique to these proceedings, and customized scripts are the service mark, trademark and/or trade dress of CadmiumCD and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written notification. All other trademarks, slogans, company names or logos are the property of their respective owners. Reference to any products, services, processes or other information, by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, owner, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation thereof by CadmiumCD.

As a user you may provide CadmiumCD with feedback. Any ideas or suggestions you provide through any feedback mechanisms on these proceedings may be used by CadmiumCD, at our sole discretion, including future modifications to the eventScribe product. You hereby grant to CadmiumCD and our assigns a perpetual, worldwide, fully transferable, sublicensable, irrevocable, royalty free license to use, reproduce, modify, create derivative works from, distribute, and display the feedback in any manner and for any purpose.

© 2016 CadmiumCD