eventscribe

The eventScribe Educational Program Planner system gives you access to information on sessions, special events, and the conference venue. Take a look at hotel maps to familiarize yourself with the venue, read biographies of our plenary speakers, and download handouts and resources for your sessions.

close this panel

SUBMIT FEEDBACKfeedback icon

Comments


close this panel
support

Technical Support


Phone: (410) 638-9239

Fax: (410) 638-6108

GoToMeeting: Meet Now!

Web: www.CadmiumCD.com

Submit Support Ticket

t on the system-->

close this panel
‹‹ Go Back

Adam Safir

Bureau of Labor Statistics



‹‹ Go Back

Lucilla Tan

Bureau of Labor Statistics



�� Go Back

Please enter your access key

The asset you are trying to access is locked for premium users. Please enter your access key to unlock.


Email This Presentation:

From:

To:

Subject:

Body:

←Back IconGems-Print

Towards Determining an Optimal Contact Attempt Threshold for a Large-Scale Personal Visit Survey

Sponsor: Survey Research Methods Section
Keywords: personal-visit survey, reporting behavior, contact history, field operations

Adam Safir

Bureau of Labor Statistics

Lucilla Tan

Bureau of Labor Statistics

While improving the design of the survey instrument and increasing the options for more convenient and/or efficient data capture are two important ways for maximizing returns on the survey operations budget, there is an additional dimension in personal-visit surveys for discretionary action that can make a difference - setting a maximum threshold for the number of contact attempts, or the level of effort, expended to resolve a case. In particular, the cost of contact attempts can be significant for personal-visit surveys with eligible sample units spread over an expansive geographic area. Before fielding a large-sample test of a proposed "optimal" contact attempt threshold, the authors initiated this study as a verification of findings from an earlier study (Safir and Tan 2009) that recommended 7 attempts as the threshold for resolving a sample unit's final disposition. Using more recent data and additional evaluation metrics, the authors perform a retrospective analysis of first wave panel data from the Consumer Expenditure Interview Survey (CEQ) collected between April 2012 and March 2014.

"eventScribe", the eventScribe logo, "CadmiumCD", and the CadmiumCD logo are trademarks of CadmiumCD LLC, and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from CadmiumCD. The appearance of these proceedings, customized graphics that are unique to these proceedings, and customized scripts are the service mark, trademark and/or trade dress of CadmiumCD and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written notification. All other trademarks, slogans, company names or logos are the property of their respective owners. Reference to any products, services, processes or other information, by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, owner, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation thereof by CadmiumCD.

As a user you may provide CadmiumCD with feedback. Any ideas or suggestions you provide through any feedback mechanisms on these proceedings may be used by CadmiumCD, at our sole discretion, including future modifications to the eventScribe product. You hereby grant to CadmiumCD and our assigns a perpetual, worldwide, fully transferable, sublicensable, irrevocable, royalty free license to use, reproduce, modify, create derivative works from, distribute, and display the feedback in any manner and for any purpose.

© 2015 CadmiumCD