eventscribe

The eventScribe Educational Program Planner system gives you access to information on sessions, special events, and the conference venue. Take a look at hotel maps to familiarize yourself with the venue, read biographies of our plenary speakers, and download handouts and resources for your sessions.

close this panel

SUBMIT FEEDBACKfeedback icon

Comments


close this panel
support

Technical Support


Phone: (410) 638-9239

Fax: (410) 638-6108

GoToMeeting: Meet Now!

Web: www.CadmiumCD.com

Submit Support Ticket

t on the system-->

close this panel
‹‹ Go Back

Qiyuan Pan

CDC/NCHS/DHCS



‹‹ Go Back

Rong Wei

CDC/NCHS/ORM



�� Go Back

Please enter your access key

The asset you are trying to access is locked for premium users. Please enter your access key to unlock.


Email This Presentation:

From:

To:

Subject:

Body:

←Back IconGems-Print

645 – Clinical Trials and Survey Design

Relationship Between Missing Information and Missing Data in 2012 NAMCS Physician Workflow Mail Survey

Sponsor: Government Statistics Section
Keywords: Multiple imputation, fraction of missing information (?), sufficient number of imputations, missing data, NAMCS

Qiyuan Pan

CDC/NCHS/DHCS

Rong Wei

CDC/NCHS/ORM

In Multiple Imputation (MI), the fraction of missing information, ?, defined as a certain function of the constituents of the variance of the MI estimator, has from the beginning played a key role in deciding how large the number m of imputations should be (Rubin 1987). Rubin defines the relative efficiency of m as RE = (1+?/m)-1/2, and concludes that only a small m, e.g. m = 2 or 3, is needed in MI for ??0.3. In recent years, however, researchers have presented evidence that much greater m values are needed in MI. A better understanding of ? helps explain why Rubin's RE may give an m that is apparently sufficient but may actually be too small for many important statistical inferences. To date little research on ? has been done using real survey data. In the present study, ? was determined for 4, 10, 20, and 29% of missing data using the 2012 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) Physician Workflow Mail Survey. The results and their implications add to our understanding of ? as well as the relevance of the ?-based RE in determining a sufficient m.

"eventScribe", the eventScribe logo, "CadmiumCD", and the CadmiumCD logo are trademarks of CadmiumCD LLC, and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from CadmiumCD. The appearance of these proceedings, customized graphics that are unique to these proceedings, and customized scripts are the service mark, trademark and/or trade dress of CadmiumCD and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written notification. All other trademarks, slogans, company names or logos are the property of their respective owners. Reference to any products, services, processes or other information, by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, owner, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation thereof by CadmiumCD.

As a user you may provide CadmiumCD with feedback. Any ideas or suggestions you provide through any feedback mechanisms on these proceedings may be used by CadmiumCD, at our sole discretion, including future modifications to the eventScribe product. You hereby grant to CadmiumCD and our assigns a perpetual, worldwide, fully transferable, sublicensable, irrevocable, royalty free license to use, reproduce, modify, create derivative works from, distribute, and display the feedback in any manner and for any purpose.

© 2015 CadmiumCD