eventscribe

The eventScribe Educational Program Planner system gives you access to information on sessions, special events, and the conference venue. Take a look at hotel maps to familiarize yourself with the venue, read biographies of our plenary speakers, and download handouts and resources for your sessions.

close this panel
support

Technical Support


Phone: (410) 638-9239

Fax: (410) 638-6108

GoToMeeting: Meet Now!

Web: www.CadmiumCD.com

close this panel
←Back

Why Do Survey Participants Choose to Report by Web, Paper, or Not at All? Results from an American Community Survey Qualitative Study

Sponsor: Survey Research Methods Section
Keywords: Reporting options, mode choice, nonrespondents, follow-up study, applied behavior analysis, motivation to respond, Internet survey response

Elizabeth Nichols

U.S. Census Bureau

In April 2011, the U.S. Census Bureau conducted an Internet test of the American Community Survey (ACS), in which different mailing materials and mailing strategies were used to offer an Internet reporting option for the survey. In two conditions, an Internet reporting option was initially offered, with a paper form following in a subsequent mailing. Only the timing of the subsequent mailing varied in those conditions. In two other conditions, both modes were offered simultaneously, but the panels varied the amount of emphasis on the Internet option. In April and May, the Census Bureau fielded a follow-up telephone survey of approximately 1,700 ACS respondents and nonrespondents to the Internet Test survey. This follow-up study gathered information about how effectively the mailing materials for the Internet Test conveyed the response option choices. Questions in this follow-up study focused on which components of the mailing materials or mailing strategy motivated sample households to respond by the Internet or by the paper form. The follow-up also contained questions to determine why some households did not respond at all. This paper presents results from the follow-up telephone study of respondents and nonrespondents to the 2011 ACS Internet Test. Results of the follow-up study show that the majority of respondents knew they could respond either by paper or via the Internet to the ACS. The results did not provide substantial support for the finding in the literature (e.g., Millar and Dillman, 2011) that offering multiple modes simultaneously and forcing participants to make a reporting mode choice is the reason why some participants never respond. Instead, many nonrespondents in this study claimed never to have received the ACS envelope; if they did receive the envelope, many said they did not open it because they were too busy.

"eventScribe", the eventScribe logo, "CadmiumCD", and the CadmiumCD logo are trademarks of CadmiumCD LLC, and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from CadmiumCD. The appearance of these proceedings, customized graphics that are unique to these proceedings, and customized scripts are the service mark, trademark and/or trade dress of CadmiumCD and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without prior written notification. All other trademarks, slogans, company names or logos are the property of their respective owners. Reference to any products, services, processes or other information, by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, owner, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation thereof by CadmiumCD.

As a user you may provide CadmiumCD with feedback. Any ideas or suggestions you provide through any feedback mechanisms on these proceedings may be used by CadmiumCD, at our sole discretion, including future modifications to the eventScribe product. You hereby grant to CadmiumCD and our assigns a perpetual, worldwide, fully transferable, sublicensable, irrevocable, royalty free license to use, reproduce, modify, create derivative works from, distribute, and display the feedback in any manner and for any purpose.

© 2013 CadmiumCD