Online Program Home
  My Program

All Times EDT

Abstract Details

Activity Number: 568 - Perspectives on Grant Review: Leave it, Fix it, or Nix It?
Type: Invited
Date/Time: Thursday, August 6, 2020 : 3:00 PM to 4:50 PM
Sponsor: Social Statistics Section
Abstract #309522
Title: Burning Money? the Inherent Inefficiency of Grant Proposal Competitions in Allocating Research Funding, and Possible Alternatives
Author(s): Kevin Gross*
Companies: North Carolina State University
Keywords:
Abstract:

Scientific research funding is allocated largely by soliciting and ranking competitive grant proposals. In these competitions, some of the funding program’s impact on science is squandered because applying researchers must spend time writing proposals instead of doing science. To what extent does the community’s investment in proposal preparation negate the scientific impact of the funding program? We use the economic theory of contests to analyze how efficiently grant-proposal competitions and alternative funding mechanisms advance science. We find that the effort researchers waste in writing proposals may approach the total scientific value of the research that the funding supports, especially when only a few proposals can be funded. Moreover, when professional pressures motivate investigators to seek funding for reasons that extend beyond the value of the proposed science (e.g., promotion, prestige), the entire program can actually hamper scientific progress when the number of awards is small. We suggest that lost efficiency may be restored either by partial lotteries for funding, or by funding researchers based on past scientific success.


Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2020 program