Online Program Home
My Program

Abstract Details

Activity Number: 504 - The Future of Statistical Consulting and Collaboration
Type: Topic Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Section on Statistical Consulting
Abstract #304622 Presentation
Title: Stats, Glass and Crime: Let's Make the Right Decision
Author(s): Felix Jimenez* and Amanda Koepke and Ruthie Corzo and Eric Steel
Companies: University of Colorado, NIST and National Institute of Standards and Technology and National Institute of Standards and Technology and National Institute of Standards and Technology
Keywords: forensic science; permutation test; statistical collaboration; trace evidence; sensitivity analysis

In the forensic analysis of glass fragments, a questioned (Q) sample is compared to a known (K) sample to determine whether they originated from the same glass source. Forensic practitioners currently use two approaches to compare the K and Q: a qualitative inspection of the u-XRF spectra and match criterion using elemental ratios. The former is subjective, which may result in differing conclusions amongst practitioners, and neither addresses the effect of the fragment’s shape and size on the fluorescence intensity.

To address these shortcomings, a statistical framework is developed to analyze the u-XRF spectra. One procedure is built around a permutation test, and another takes a model-based approach. The sensitivity of the results to differences in the morphology of the fragments is studied. In addition, special attention is paid to how collaboration between the domain experts and the statisticians helped create this procedure. We discovered that adjusting the number of K samples changes the amount of diversity in the glass fragments present. This can in turn influence the rate of false positives/negatives, which affects the usefulness of this procedure in the field.

Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2019 program