Online Program Home
  My Program

Abstract Details

Activity Number: 343 - Advances in Statistical Process Control and Capability
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Quality and Productivity Section
Abstract #324877 View Presentation
Title: Conditional Median Run Length as Performance Measure of Shewhart S^2 Control Chart with Estimated Parameter
Author(s): Martin Guillermo Cornejo Sarmiento* and Subhabrata Chakraborti and Eugenio Kahn Epprecht
Companies: Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) and University of Alabama and Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)
Keywords: S^2 and S Control Chart ; Conditional Control Chart Performance ; Run Length Distribution ; Run Length Quantiles ; Median Run Length (??????) ; Average Run Length (??????)
Abstract:

Several recent works, in Statistical Monitoring Process, have addressed the effect of parameter estimation on the performance of control charts. Although the measures of this performance are generally expressed based on particular associated characteristics of the unconditional run length (????) distribution, recently, some researchers have proposed the use of the conditional ???? distribution that is considered more meaningful in real applications. The most traditional performance indicator is the average ???? (??????). Nevertheless, this expected value is not a good representative measure for the center because the ???? distribution is usually right-skewed. Therefore, we study the ??-quantiles of the conditional in-control run length (????????????) of the ??2 and ?? control charts. It is worth to note that these quantiles, the distribution of which is obtained analytically, are random variables when the parameter of the ???? process dispersion is estimated. One specific quantile is proposed: the conditional in-control median run length ???????????? (??????????0.50). We analyze and compare the entire distribution of the ???????????? and the conditional ???? ?????? (????????????). The results show that the variability of the ???????????? is smaller than the ????????????. Moreover, the ???????????? and ???????????? requires similar minimum values of number of Phase I samples (??), to guarantee a specified minimum limit (a percentage of its nominal value) with a high probability. For that reason, the proposed robust ???????????? may be a good alternative performance measure.


Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2017 program

 
 
Copyright © American Statistical Association