Online Program Home
  My Program

Abstract Details

Activity Number: 36 - Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Genomic Biomarkers for Cancer
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Sunday, July 30, 2017 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Statistics in Genomics and Genetics
Abstract #322560
Title: Integrative Boosting with Multiple Genomic Platforms Improves Prediction Accuracy for Survival Time in Cancer Patients
Author(s): Kin Yau Wong* and Cheng Fan and Maki Tanoika and Joel S. Parker and Andrew B. Nobel and Donglin Zeng and Danyu Lin and Charles M. Perou
Companies: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and University of North Carolina and University of North Carolina and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Keywords: Boosting ; Integrative analysis ; Survival Analysis ; Variable Selection
Abstract:

Recent technological advances have made it possible to collect a variety of genomic data on the same cancer patients. Therefore, it would be of great interest to integrate multiple genomic data types for predicting clinical outcomes such as survival times. We propose a variable selection method called Integrative Boosting (I-Boost), which makes use of all available clinical and genomic data, but treats each data type separately, such that small but predictive data types would not be dominated by the larger ones. Simulation studies and applications to The Cancer Genome Atlas reveal that I-Boost performs substantially better than existing variable selection methods in prediction accuracy. Using I-Boost, we show that combining genomic variables with clinical variables provides more accurate prediction of survival time than the use of either data type alone. In addition, the currently available gene modules provide better or similar prediction accuracy when compared to the totality of individual gene expression data. Finally, clinical and gene expression data have higher prognostic values than other types higher prognostic values than other types of genomic data.


Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2017 program

 
 
Copyright © American Statistical Association