Online Program Home
My Program

Abstract Details

Activity Number: 563
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 : 11:35 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Section on Statistics in Genomics and Genetics
Abstract #321813
Title: Comparison of the Bayesian and Frequentist Estimation of the Inbreeding Coefficient
Author(s): Zhenyi Xue*
Companies: Becton, Dickinson, and Company
Keywords: the inbreeding coefficient ; direct sample estimator ; maximum empirical likelihood estimator ; Bayesian pseudo-empirical likelihood estimator ; single nucleotide polymorphism ; Monte Carlo simulation
Abstract:

Testing for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) is routinely conducted as an initial screening for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism. Much less effort, however, is spent in the estimation of the inbreeding coefficient, which can be considered as a measure of the deviation from HWE. For biallelic single locus, we use Monte Carlo simulations to compare the following four estimators of the inbreeding coefficients in terms of bias, mean square error, average interval length, coverage probability, as well as the probability of being outside of the parameter space. They are direct sample estimator, maximum empirical likelihood estimator, parametric Bayesian estimator and Bayesian pseudo-empirical likelihood estimator. The simulations show that both frequentist methods are similar and may produce estimators outside of the parameter space when the allele frequency is small. On the other hand, the Bayesian approach always produces estimator within the parameter space through an appropriate prior distribution. Furthermore, the Bayesian estimators have larger coverage probability and smaller MSE in the exchange of larger bias and longer interval length.


Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2016 program

 
 
Copyright © American Statistical Association