JSM 2015 Preliminary Program

Online Program Home
My Program

Abstract Details

Activity Number: 34
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Sunday, August 9, 2015 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Survey Research Methods Section
Abstract #315048 View Presentation
Title: Comparison of Landline and Cell Phone Response Patterns from a Call-Back Telephone Survey: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and Asthma Call-Back Survey (ACBS)
Author(s): Xiaoting Qin*
Companies: CDC
Keywords: Response Patterns ; Call-back Telephone Survey ; Cellphone ; Landline
Abstract:

Finding response patterns is key to increase survey completion. The ACBS follows up on the BRFSS by calling BRFSS respondents identified with asthma. Using the 2012 and 2013 ACBS disposition files, we computed the rate of eligible BRFSS respondents who agreed to a call-back (AR) and the ACBS response rate (RR) based on the American Association of Public Opinion Research formula. We also examined the difference in RR between landline (LL) and cellphone (CP) samples and assessed the impact of lag days between interviews on ACBS completion. BRFSS CP samples agreed to a call-back more often than LL samples (AR: 75.5% vs. 70.9%). However, when contacted for ACBS, CP RR was lower than LL RR (43.4% vs. 47.0%), except for adults aged 25-44 years. Among them, CP RR was 1.6% higher than LL RR. The difference in RR (3.6%) between ACBS LL and CP responses was smaller than the difference in corresponding BRFSS RR (11.8%, 2013 data). The RRs for both ACBS LL and CP responses were highest if call-back was within 2 days of BRFSS interviews (92.3% and 88.8%). As lag days increased, the ACBS RR decreased. The CP RR showed a sharper drop; after 2 weeks, the RR gap between LL and CP reached 12.0%.


Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2015 program





For program information, contact the JSM Registration Department or phone (888) 231-3473.

For Professional Development information, contact the Education Department.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.

2015 JSM Online Program Home