Abstract Details
Activity Number:
|
355
|
Type:
|
Contributed
|
Date/Time:
|
Tuesday, August 5, 2014 : 11:35 AM to 12:20 PM
|
Sponsor:
|
Section on Statistics in Epidemiology
|
Abstract #314050
|
|
Title:
|
Using Bayesian Statistical Inference to Improve the Measurement of Adequacy of Mental Health Care Utilization in a Nationally Representative Sample
|
Author(s):
|
Chih-Nan Chen*+ and Benjamin Cook and Margarita Alegria
|
Companies:
|
National Taipei University and Center for Multicultural Mental Health Research and Center for Multicultural Mental Health Research
|
Keywords:
|
Bayesian estimation ;
Mental health ;
Health care research
|
Abstract:
|
In health care research, longitudinal analysis of health care episodes is preferred to cross-sectional analysis because it avoids arbitrary observation periods and provides more information on temporal changes in utilization behavior. Analysis of longitudinal claims must account for left and right censoring to construct valid episodes of care. Analyzing individuals with probable mental illness from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), we apply two-part negative binomial models to account for a significant proportion of zero service use. We use the Gibbs sampler to simulate the posterior mean and standard deviations from the joint distribution of observations. We compare Bayesian predictions to three alternatives: a method naïve to censoring; a naïve method that drops censored cases; and a maximum likelihood estimator of the censored two-part negative binomial model. Bayesian and MLE estimators reported similar mean numbers of mental health care visits per treatment episode. Typically used naïve methods substantially under-estimated the number of visits per episode. We conclude that Bayesian approaches to censoring can greatly improve health care episodes analyses.
|
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2014 program
|
2014 JSM Online Program Home
For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.
If you have questions about the Professional Development program, please contact the Education Department.
The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
Copyright © American Statistical Association.