JSM 2014 Home
Online Program Home
My Program

Abstract Details

Activity Number: 616
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Thursday, August 7, 2014 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Survey Research Methods Section
Abstract #312744 View Presentation
Title: Analyzing Potential Mode Effects in the National Crime Victimization Survey
Author(s): George Couzens*+ and Christopher Krebs and Marcus Berzofsky
Companies: RTI International and RTI International and RTI International
Keywords: National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) ; Panel Survey ; Survey Mode ; Respondent Fatigue ; Total Survey Error (TSE)
Abstract:

The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) is a nationally-representative survey of the non-institutionalized U.S. population aged 12 and older and utilizes a 7-wave rotating panel design. Prior to 2006, first wave interviews were not used in crime victimization estimation - these interviews were used only to provide a temporal landmark for survey participants to control telescoping, ensuring that the second- through seventh-wave interviews had bounded reference periods. Beginning in 2006, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) began using first-wave interview data to produce estimates as a way to cut costs without sacrificing estimate precision. This change is significant in many ways, not the least of which is its potential for the introduction of multiple sources of bias. This paper addresses how the authors approached analysis of mode effect bias - one of the potential sources of error in the NCVS resulting from this change. Since first-wave interviews are primarily conducted in-person and second- through seventh-wave interviews are primarily conducted over the phone, the potential for mode effect bias is high. Quantifying this potential source of error is important for understanding how incorporation of first-wave data affects victimization estimates in the NCVS. After accounting for respondents' level of exposure to the NCVS, the difference in victimization rates between in-person and telephone groups is shown to be non-significant, suggesting the apparent mode effect is actually a symptom of respondent fatigue.


Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2014 program




2014 JSM Online Program Home

For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.

If you have questions about the Professional Development program, please contact the Education Department.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.

ASA Meetings Department  •  732 North Washington Street, Alexandria, VA 22314  •  (703) 684-1221  •  meetings@amstat.org
Copyright © American Statistical Association.