Abstract Details
Activity Number:
|
463
|
Type:
|
Contributed
|
Date/Time:
|
Wednesday, August 6, 2014 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
|
Sponsor:
|
Section on Nonparametric Statistics
|
Abstract #312657
|
View Presentation
|
Title:
|
Hypothesis Testing for Sparse Binary Regression
|
Author(s):
|
Rajarshi Mukherjee*+ and Xihong Lin and Natesh S. Pillai
|
Companies:
|
Harvard and Harvard School of Public Health and Harvard
|
Keywords:
|
Minimax Hypothesis Testing ;
Sparse Alternatives ;
Detection Boundary ;
Binary Outcomes ;
Higher Criticism
|
Abstract:
|
In this paper, we study the detection boundary for minimax hypothesis testing in the context of high-dimensional, sparse binary regression models. We observe a new phenomenon in the behavior of detection boundary which does not occur in the case of Gaussian linear models. We derive the detection boundary as a function of two components: the minimal signal strength required for successful detection and the sparsity of the design matrix. If the design matrix with binary entries is too sparse, any test is asymptotically powerless irrespective of the magnitude of signal strength. For binary design matrices which are not too sparse, our results are parallel to the Gaussian case. In this context we derive detection boundaries for both dense and sparse regimes. For the dense regime, our results are rate optimal; for the sparse regime, we provide sharp constants. In the dense regime the generalized likelihood ratio test continues to be asymptotically powerful above the detection boundary. In the sparse regime, however, we need to design a new test which is a version of the popular Higher Criticism test. We show that this new test attains the detection boundary as a sharp upper bound.
|
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2014 program
|
2014 JSM Online Program Home
For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.
If you have questions about the Professional Development program, please contact the Education Department.
The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
Copyright © American Statistical Association.