Abstract Details
Activity Number:
|
350
|
Type:
|
Contributed
|
Date/Time:
|
Tuesday, August 5, 2014 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
|
Sponsor:
|
Biopharmaceutical Section
|
Abstract #311275
|
|
Title:
|
A Simple Approach for Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Two Concordance Correlation Coefficients Estimated on the Same Subjects
|
Author(s):
|
Hung-Mo Lin*+ and John Michael Williamson
|
Companies:
|
Mount Sinai School of Medicine and CDC
|
Keywords:
|
Agreement ;
Concordance correlation coefficient ;
Power ;
Sample size ;
Taylor series linearization
|
Abstract:
|
Some studies are designed to assess the agreement between different raters and/or different instruments in the medical sciences and pharmaceutical research. Often the same sample will be used to compare the agreement of two or more assessment methods for simplicity and to take advantage of the positive correlation of the ratings. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) is often used as a measure of agreement when the rating is a continuous variable. We present an approach for calculating the sample size required for testing the equality of two CCC's, H: CCC1CCC versus HCCC1 CCC,where two assessment methods are used on the same sample with two raters resulting in correlated CCC estimates. Our approach is to simulate one large "exemplary" dataset based on specification of the joint distribution of the pairwise ratings for the two methods. We then create two new random variables from the simulated data that have the same variance-covariance matrix as the two dependent CCC estimates using the Taylor series linearization method. The method requires minimal computing time and can be easily extended to comparing more than two CCC's, or Kappa statistics.
|
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2014 program
|
2014 JSM Online Program Home
For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.
If you have questions about the Professional Development program, please contact the Education Department.
The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
Copyright © American Statistical Association.