Abstract Details
Activity Number:
|
260
|
Type:
|
Contributed
|
Date/Time:
|
Monday, August 5, 2013 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
|
Sponsor:
|
Section on Statistical Education
|
Abstract - #310325 |
Title:
|
Measurement Usage in Self-Assessment
|
Author(s):
|
Julia Norton*+ and John Dewey Lovell and John Alva Norton and Yaelan Wong
|
Companies:
|
California State University, East Bay and California State University, East Bay and California State University, East Bay and California State University, East Bay
|
Keywords:
|
Assessment ;
Measurement ;
Introductory courses
|
Abstract:
|
Continuing our study of self-assessment of individual exam questions , we turn to various forms of rules for assigning values to the question 'How certain are you of the correctness of your answer?' In several introductory psychology classes we measured self-assessment as it correlates to correct response or incorrect response using several rules for assigning assessments. When we originally used a 1 to 5 scale (1 certain correct and 5 no knowledge), we noticed that some individuals always responded sure or unsure (1 or 5) with no further gradation. These results generally corresponded to better students using a 1 rating and poorer students using a 5 rating. Several rules were tested. Where possible we have repeated tests over individuals using the same rule. Our results are compared with past results with these new rules or instructions given to students during testing.
|
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2013 program
|
2013 JSM Online Program Home
For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.
If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
Copyright © American Statistical Association.