Abstract Details
Activity Number:
|
186
|
Type:
|
Contributed
|
Date/Time:
|
Monday, August 5, 2013 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
|
Sponsor:
|
Survey Research Methods Section
|
Abstract - #310009 |
Title:
|
How Changes to Improve the Reliability of Telephone Status Items Affect Telephone Status Estimates
|
Author(s):
|
Vince Welch, Jr.*+ and Robert Montgomery
|
Companies:
|
NORC at the University of Chicago and NORC at the University of Chicago
|
Keywords:
|
Weighting ;
Dual-frame ;
Cell phone ;
Reliability ;
Validity ;
Screening
|
Abstract:
|
When conducting telephone surveys in the modern landscape ascertaining the telephone status (e.g., wireless only, wireless mostly, or landline mostly) of survey respondents is important for computing weights. However, the dominant items used to assess telephone status have not been fully tested for reliability and validity (AAPOR, 2010). Indeed, previous cognitive testing (Welch, et al, 2012) demonstrates that respondents have widely varying ideas about the meaning of the qualifiers 'some', 'most', and 'somewhat' in telephone status items that are currently in the field. Further, this initial work suggests that respondents prefer quantitative measures. Our current research extends the qualitative work that was done by implementing an experiment using new response options for the wireless mostly item (Blumberg and Luke, 2012) in a telephone setting in a series of national, general population surveys (N~2,000). We will explore the effect of implementing the reliability improvements suggested by cognitive testing on the distribution of telephone statuses by age, race/ethnicity,sex, and socioeconomic status. Implications for future dual-frame RDD surveys will be discussed.
|
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2013 program
|
2013 JSM Online Program Home
For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.
If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
Copyright © American Statistical Association.