Abstract Details
Activity Number:
|
194
|
Type:
|
Contributed
|
Date/Time:
|
Monday, August 5, 2013 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
|
Sponsor:
|
Biometrics Section
|
Abstract - #309756 |
Title:
|
Comparing Different Methods of Handling Overrun in Group Sequential Trials
|
Author(s):
|
Timothy Skalland*+ and Sarah Emerson
|
Companies:
|
Department of Statistics, Oregon State University and Oregon State University
|
Keywords:
|
Clinical Trials ;
Overrun ;
Interim Analysis ;
Group Sequential Methods
|
Abstract:
|
A common occurrence in sequential clinical trials is the accrual of data after a stopping region has been reached. The data acquired after a stopping boundary has been passed is called overrun and several methods have been examined for dealing with overrun. Four methods were explored by Sooriyarachchi et al (2003) using an analysis-time ordering of the outcome space, which orders observations based on the observed statistic (ie: sample mean) and the time of the analysis. Another approach is to order the outcome space by the sample mean (maximum likelihood ordering), which orders observations solely on the observed statistic. In this presentation, I use simulations to compare the deletion and combining p-values methods using these two orderings of the outcome space.
|
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2013 program
|
2013 JSM Online Program Home
For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.
If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
Copyright © American Statistical Association.