JSM 2013 Home
Online Program Home
My Program

Abstract Details

Activity Number: 303
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Biometrics Section
Abstract - #308428
Title: Adaptive Resistant Regression Method (ARM): A Better Alternative to Quantile Normalization for Methylation Data
Author(s): Jean-Philippe Fortin*+ and Aurélie Labbe and Celia M.T. Greenwood and Mathieu Lemire and Brent W. Zanke and Thomas J. Hudson
Companies: Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University and Ontario Institute of Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Ontario Institute of Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
Keywords: Normalization ; Microarray ; DNA Methylation ; Epigenetics ; Illumina 450k ; Genomics
Abstract:

Motivation: DNA methylation levels can be estimated with microarrays, but the signals require normalization to adjust for technical artifacts. Current packages for Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation 450k platform use different versions of quantile normalization, but none is completely appropriate for methylation data.

Results: We present a new method, the Adaptive Resistant Regression method (ARRm) for normalization of DNA methylation data from the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip, using a one-step correction model for background noise, dye bias, design bias and spatial effects. It is a novel approach containing adjustments that vary with the percentiles of the methylation levels and taking advantage of the negative control probes. The key feature of the method is that contrary to methods based on quantile normalization, it does not rely on an assumption of distributional similarity across subjects. ARRm is carefully evaluated against several other approaches for normalization, using a dataset containing 2053 samples where methylation was measured in either lymphocytes or lymphoblasts. Our method is shown to be the most appropriate choice for DNA methylation data.


Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2013 program




2013 JSM Online Program Home

For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.

If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.

ASA Meetings Department  •  732 North Washington Street, Alexandria, VA 22314  •  (703) 684-1221  •  meetings@amstat.org
Copyright © American Statistical Association.