Abstract Details
Activity Number:
|
168
|
Type:
|
Topic Contributed
|
Date/Time:
|
Monday, August 5, 2013 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
|
Sponsor:
|
Section on Statistical Education
|
Abstract - #308326 |
Title:
|
The Relevance of Rhetoric to Statistical Literacy
|
Author(s):
|
Joel Best*+
|
Companies:
|
|
Keywords:
|
rhetoric ;
statistical literacy ;
numeracy
|
Abstract:
|
Calls for greater statistical literacy often emphasize the need to improve mathematical skills; non-mathematical matters tend to be dismissed as "bias" (a convenient term, because it has both a technical meaning as any extraneous factor that affects an outcome, and a popular meaning as some sort of deliberate distortion). In practice, thinking critically about bias is a far more important aspect of statistical literacy than correcting shortcomings in mathematical understanding. Statistical literacy needs to incorporate an understanding of rhetoric (the study of persuasion). Statistics are enlisted to support particular arguments, and the people making those arguments are often convinced that their figures-as well as their conclusions-are sound. Critical statistical literacy requires thinking about rhetoric, about the way statistical evidence is used. Dubious statistics often involve rhetoric that links numbers to flawed reasoning. One effective way to incorporate rhetoric into teaching statistical literacy is to demonstrate that parallel patterns of erroneous reasoning may be found in advocates advancing opposing views.
|
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2013 program
|
2013 JSM Online Program Home
For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.
If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
Copyright © American Statistical Association.