Abstract Details
Activity Number:
|
153
|
Type:
|
Invited
|
Date/Time:
|
Monday, August 5, 2013 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
|
Sponsor:
|
Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences
|
Abstract - #307038 |
Title:
|
Robust Analysis of High-Throughput Screening (HTS) Assay Data
|
Author(s):
|
Changwon Lim*+ and Pranab K Sen and Shyamal D. Peddada
|
Companies:
|
Loyola University and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and NIEHS, NIH
|
Keywords:
|
Dose-response study ;
False discovery rate (FDR) ;
Heteroscedasticity ;
Hill model ;
M-estimation procedure ;
Toxicology
|
Abstract:
|
Quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) assays use cells or tissues to screen thousands of compounds in a short period of time. Data generated from qHTS assays are evaluated using nonlinear regression models such as the Hill model and decisions regarding toxicity are made using the estimates of the parameters of the model. For any given compound, the variability in the observed response may either be constant across dose groups (homoscedasticity) or vary with dose (heteroscedasticity). Secondly, since thousands of chemicals are evaluated simultaneously, it is not uncommon to find outliers and influential observations in the data. It is well-known that the variance structure and outliers play an important role in the analysis of nonlinear regression models. Since thousands of chemicals are processed in a given run of the assay, it is necessary to develop and use methodology that is robust to variance structure and outliers so that a researcher does not have to perform model diagnostics for each individual model. In this talk we describe such a robust methodology and illustrate it using a data set obtained from the U.S. National Toxicology Program.
|
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2013 program
|
2013 JSM Online Program Home
For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.
If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
Copyright © American Statistical Association.