The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
Online Program Home
Abstract Details
Activity Number:
|
253
|
Type:
|
Contributed
|
Date/Time:
|
Monday, July 30, 2012 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
|
Sponsor:
|
Biometrics Section
|
Abstract - #306707 |
Title:
|
Validating a Cox Proportional-Hazards Model
|
Author(s):
|
Tristan Grogan*+ and David Elashoff
|
Companies:
|
University of California at Los Angeles and University of California at Los Angeles
|
Address:
|
2600 Overland Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90064, United States
|
Keywords:
|
Cox proportional-hazards ;
Validation ;
Survival data analysis ;
biomarkers
|
Abstract:
|
While several methods have been published on validating standard logistic or linear models, much less material exists on validating time-to-event models, such as the Cox proportional-hazards model. During the course of this research, an investigation of four different strategies for validating the Cox model was carried out, utilizing data from a prostate cancer study. These validation techniques are especially important for biomarker studies to aid in combating the effect of selection bias, and would strengthen the results and credibility of any study.
This paper will present four performance measures for assessing whether a model has evidence for being validated or not-comparing model coefficients between training and test data sets, assessing Harrell's c-index between the training and test models, running a cross-validation technique, and comparing recurrence risk predictions between the training and test models.
|
The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2012 program
|
2012 JSM Online Program Home
For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.
If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.