The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
            
             
                    Online Program Home
            
            
             
            
        
	Abstract Details
	
	
		
			
				
				
				
					
						| 
							Activity Number:
						 | 
						
							
							506 
								
							
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
							Type:
						 | 
						
							Contributed
						 | 
					 				 
					
						| 
							Date/Time:
						 | 
						
							Wednesday, August 1, 2012 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
							Sponsor:
						 | 
						
							Section on Risk Analysis	
						 | 
					 					 
				
					
						| Abstract - #304716 | 
					 
					
						| 
							Title:
						 | 
						
							A Note on the Cost of Hedging Variable Annuities
						 | 
					  	
								
				
					| 
						Author(s):
					 | 
					
						Liang Hong*+ 
					 | 
				 
				
					| 
						Companies:
					 | 
					
						Bradley University 
					 | 
				 
				
					| 
						Address:
					 | 
					 
						464 Bradley Hall, Peoria, IL, 61625, United States 
					 | 
				 
				
					| 
						Keywords:
					 | 
					
						
							Cost of Hedging ; 
							Variable Annuities ; 
							Re-balancing ; 
							Random Walk ; 
							Fixed Transaction Cost ; 
							Proportional Transaction Cost 
					 | 
				 
				
					| 
						Abstract:
					 | 
					
						 
							For variable annuities, the cost of hedging must be taken into consideration when firms use dynamic hedging strategies. For a long time, some finance and risk management experts argue without proof that re-balancing delta to the hedge limit is always more cost-efficient than re-balancing delta to the initial position. We study this problem rigorously when the hedge position follows a random walk. Using the ergodic method of semi-Markov processes, we find that re-balancing delta to the initial position is more cost-efficient than re-balancing it to the edge for a fixed transaction cost. However, when the transaction cost is proportional to the hedge limit, re-balancing to the initial position is less cost-efficient than re-balancing  to the edge. The results in this paper may allow practicing actuaries and finance professionals to make judicious decisions.   
						 
					 | 
				 
				 
				 
				
					The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name. 
					Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
				 
				
				
					Back to the full JSM 2012 program
				 
			 | 
		
	
	
	
	
		
		2012 JSM Online Program Home
		
		For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. 
		
		If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.