The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
Online Program Home
Abstract Details
Activity Number:
|
190
|
Type:
|
Contributed
|
Date/Time:
|
Monday, July 30, 2012 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
|
Sponsor:
|
Section on Risk Analysis
|
Abstract - #304709 |
Title:
|
Model Evaluation, Discrepancy Function Estimation, and Social Choice Theory
|
Author(s):
|
Andrew Neath*+ and Joseph Cavanaugh and Adam Weyhaupt
|
Companies:
|
SIU Edwardsville and University of Iowa and SIU Edwardsville
|
Address:
|
Dept of Math and Stats, Edwardsville, IL, 62026, United States
|
Keywords:
|
model selection ;
resampling ;
conceptual predictive statistic
|
Abstract:
|
A discrepancy function provides for an evaluation of a candidate model by quantifying the disparity between the candidate model and the true model which generated the observed data. The best model from a candidate class is the one judged to have minimum discrepancy with the true model. Since data provides only partial information on the underlying true model, we consider taking repeated simulations using some resampling procedure as each representing some possibility for the true model. Each of the candidate models can be judged against each of the simulated versions of the true model. Model evaluation is then achieved by providing an overall judgment on each candidate model. As social choice theory, or voting theory, addresses the problem of turning individual preferences into a group preference, we see that social choice theory can be used in developing a new approach to model evaluation.
|
The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2012 program
|
2012 JSM Online Program Home
For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.
If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.