The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
Online Program Home
Abstract Details
Activity Number:
|
122
|
Type:
|
Topic Contributed
|
Date/Time:
|
Monday, July 30, 2012 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
|
Sponsor:
|
Section on Survey Research Methods
|
Abstract - #304601 |
Title:
|
Replicate Variance Estimation in a Two-Phase Sample Design Setting: Simulation Study with National Survey of College Graduates Data
|
Author(s):
|
Michael White*+ and Jean Opsomer
|
Companies:
|
U.S. Census Bureau and Colorado State University
|
Address:
|
301 Linden Ln, La Plata, MD, 20646, United States
|
Keywords:
|
NSCG ;
ACS ;
two-phase sample design ;
variance estimation ;
replication ;
simulation
|
Abstract:
|
The 2010 National Survey of College Graduates (NSCG) selected its sample from 2009 American Community Survey respondents, creating a two-phase sample design. This creates variance estimation complexities when using replication methods, as there are two sample designs to account for. One solution is to create a set of replicates for each sample design phase but this can be unwieldy as it leads to a large number of replicates. Another solution, which we pursued, is to use replicates from the first-phase sample and adjust them to account for the second-phase sample design. In particular, we used a Reweighted Expansion Estimator (REE) that post-stratifies the second-phase sampling weights back to the first-phase estimated totals within each of the second-phase sampling stratum. We conducted a simulation study to evaluate the performance of the REE estimator with different replication methods, including successive difference, grouped-jackknife, and balanced repeated replication. Initial results showed poor performance with some replicate variance estimates due to the inability of the replicates to capture the systematic sample selection used in the second-phase sample design. Accounting for the systematic second-phase sample with post-stratification resulted in good performance for the REE estimator with all the replication methods and the successive difference replication method was ultimately chosen as the 2010 NSCG production method.
|
The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
Back to the full JSM 2012 program
|
2012 JSM Online Program Home
For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.
If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.