The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.
            
             
                    Online Program Home
            
            
             
            
        
	Abstract Details
	
	
		
			
				
				
				
					
						| 
							Activity Number:
						 | 
						
							
							476 
								
							
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
							Type:
						 | 
						
							Contributed
						 | 
					 				 
					
						| 
							Date/Time:
						 | 
						
							Wednesday, August 1, 2012 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 PM
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
							Sponsor:
						 | 
						
							Section on Survey Research Methods	
						 | 
					 					 
				
					
						| Abstract - #304152 | 
					 
					
						| 
							Title:
						 | 
						
							What's the Chance? Interviewers' Expectations of Response in the 2010 SCF
						 | 
					  	
								
				
					| 
						Author(s):
					 | 
					
						Arthur Kennickell*+ 
					 | 
				 
				
					| 
						Companies:
					 | 
					
						Federal Reserve Board 
					 | 
				 
				
					| 
						Address:
					 | 
					 
						Mail Stop 153, Washington, DC, 20551-0001, United States 
					 | 
				 
				
					| 
						Keywords:
					 | 
					
						
							Paradata ; 
							Expectations ; 
							Nonresponse 
					 | 
				 
				
					| 
						Abstract:
					 | 
					
						 
							For in-person surveys, the negotiation between a respondent and an interviewer is a game  of chance where skill is important. A prioi, it is generally not known whether any given  case will be resolved as complete or incomplete, though there may be general knowledge  about what "types" of respondents may tend to be relatively difficult to interview. Aside  from the tools that may help to frame the interaction between the respondent and the  interviewer (e.g., advance letters, brochures, monetary incentives, etc.), the interviewer  must rely on his or her skill in listening to the respondent and providing information  tailored to the concerns of questions of the respondent. Through selection over time,  successful interviewers must inevitably have skills of this sort. The key question  addressed in this paper is whether interviewers have information that allows them to  assess the likely outcome of their work while they are in the midst of doing it. This  question is of interest for a number of reasons, but the issue that motivated this  investigation was the possibility that interviewers' expectations (and those of their  managers) might influence the patterns of work that lead to the ultimate distribution of  outcomes and thereby distort straightforward analysis of those patterns.   
						 
					 | 
				 
				 
				 
				
					The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name. 
					Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.
				 
				
				
					Back to the full JSM 2012 program
				 
			 | 
		
	
	
	
	
		
		2012 JSM Online Program Home
		
		For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. 
		
		If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.