JSM 2011 Online Program

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.

Abstract Details

Activity Number: 608
Type: Topic Contributed
Date/Time: Thursday, August 4, 2011 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Section on Statistics in Defense and National Security
Abstract - #301561
Title: Parametric Study of Calibration Blackbody Uncertainty Using Design of Experiment
Author(s): Nipa Phojanamongkolkij*+ and Joe A. Walker and David G. Johnson and Richard P. Cageao and Joseph J. O'Connell and Alan D. Little and Martin G. Mlynczak and Rosemary R. Baize
Companies: NASA Langley Research Center and Science Systems and Applications, Inc. and NASA Langley Research Center and NASA Langley Research Center and NASA Langley Research Center and NASA Langley Research Center and NASA Langley Research Center and NASA Langley Research Center
Address: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681,
Keywords: Design of Experiment ; Uncertainty ; Monte Carlo ; Error Propagation ; Parametric study
Abstract:

NASA is developing the CLARREO mission to provide accurate measurements to substantially improve understanding of climate change. One of the CLARREO payload is an Infrared (IR) Suite, which consists of a FTS and an on-orbit blackbody calibration and verification system. One of the most critical parts of obtaining accurate IR measurements relies on knowing the spectral radiance output from the blackbody calibration source. The blackbody radiance must be known with a low uncertainty, and the magnitude of the uncertainty itself must be reliably quantified. This study focuses on determining which parameters in the blackbody radiance equation are critical to the blackbody accuracy. Fourteen parameters are identified and explored using Design of Experiment. The parameters' ranges are based on the known specifications available at time of this study. The experiment is done by Monte Carlo simulation to estimate uncertainty. Only 4 parameters were discovered to be critical to the uncertainty. The uncertainties obtained are also compared to those obtained using the Error Propagation Law. The two methods produce statistically different, but practically indifferent uncertainties.


The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2011 program




2011 JSM Online Program Home

For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.

If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.