JSM 2011 Online Program

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the JSM sponsors, their officers, or their staff.

Abstract Details

Activity Number: 667
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Thursday, August 4, 2011 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Biopharmaceutical Section
Abstract - #300687
Title: Does Meta-Regression Have Enough Power? An Empirical Study of 500 Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
Author(s): Stephanie Ann Kovalchik*+
Companies: University of California at Los Angeles
Address: skoval@ucla.edu, Los Angeles, CA, 91106, USA
Keywords: meta-analysis ; meta-regression ; subgroup analysis ; effect modifier ; randomized controlled trials
Abstract:

When assessing treatment interventions, meta-analysts are interested in using meta-regression to identify subgroups of patients with a different treatment response. Simulation studies have suggested that, owing to loss of within-study information, meta-regression might not have sufficient power to detect covariate-treatment interactions for patient-defined covariates. To determine whether this generally holds for current quantitative reviews, I assessed the power of meta-regression for 500 recently published meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, considering a range of subgroup scenarios--varying ratio of within- to between-study information. In each case, comparison was made to the power of an individual patient data (IPD) analysis. I also summarize the findings from a survey of meta-analysts on the process and success of collecting IPD. Implications for future multitrial subgroup analyses are discussed.


The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2011 program




2011 JSM Online Program Home

For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473.

If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.