JSM Preliminary Online Program
This is the preliminary program for the 2006 Joint Statistical Meetings in Seattle, Washington.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2006 Program page




Activity Number: 390
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 9, 2006 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #306060
Title: Using Census Data to Define Estimation Areas for the American Community Survey: a Case Study
Author(s): Joseph Powers*+ and Alfredo Navarro
Companies: U.S. Census Bureau and U.S. Census Bureau
Address: P.O. BOX 1607, COLLEGE PARK, MD, 20740,
Keywords: reliability ; naive clusters ; statistical clustering ; compactness ; weighting ; estimation areas
Abstract:

In January 2005, the American Community Survey (ACS) expanded to sample all 3,219 counties in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. The ACS weighting and estimation methodology requires estimation areas to meet a minimum population size so that the observed sample size is big enough to produce estimates with adequate reliability. Counties below the threshold size must be grouped or clustered prior to estimation. A simple method groups the counties based on adjacency and then assess all the clusters using a predefined criterion. A better, automated algorithm was also developed. The algorithm is an iterative method that uses a set of Census long form characteristics to define a similarity index based on the Euclidean distance metric. This paper describes the naïve method, the algorithm, and a statistical assessment. The results of the two schemes are compared for Puerto Rico and Texas.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2006 program

JSM 2006 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised April, 2006