JSM 2005 - Toronto

Abstract #304739

This is the preliminary program for the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2005); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.



The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


The Program has labeled the meeting rooms with "letters" preceding the name of the room, designating in which facility the room is located:

Minneapolis Convention Center = “MCC” Hilton Minneapolis Hotel = “H” Hyatt Regency Minneapolis = “HY”

Back to main JSM 2005 Program page



Legend: = Applied Session, = Theme Session, = Presenter
Activity Number: 439
Type: Topic Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Statistics in Epidemiology
Abstract - #304739
Title: Evaluation of Accuracy and Optimal Cutoff of Diagnostic Devices in the Same Study
Author(s): Marina Kondratovich*+ and Waleed Yousef
Companies: U.S. Food and Drug Administration and U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Address: HFZ 550, Rockville, MD, 20850, United States
Keywords: Diagnostic Devices ; Accuracy ; Sensitivity and specificity
Abstract:

Consider the case when the diagnostic test is univariate (i.e., free prostate-specific antigen assay) and the cutoff is not predefined but selected in the study according to some rule of optimality. If the same study is used to find the optimal cutoff and then used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity for this cutoff, incorrect conclusions about the performance of the diagnostic tests can be made. Then, the question is raised whether the selection of the optimal cutoff in the study requires the independent dataset to obtain unbiased estimates of accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) with unbiased estimates of uncertainty about accuracy. There is no need for the independent dataset because, by using the appropriate bootstrap technique, the unbiased estimates of the accuracy and uncertainties can be obtained from the same study. Different types of the optimal cutoff selection will be considered, such as a percentile for specificity, maximizing sensitivity over a certain value of specificity, maximizing the weighted linear combination of sensitivity and specificity. The results of simulation will be presented.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2005 program

JSM 2005 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2005