JSM 2005 - Toronto

Abstract #304641

This is the preliminary program for the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2005); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.



The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


The Program has labeled the meeting rooms with "letters" preceding the name of the room, designating in which facility the room is located:

Minneapolis Convention Center = “MCC” Hilton Minneapolis Hotel = “H” Hyatt Regency Minneapolis = “HY”

Back to main JSM 2005 Program page



Legend: = Applied Session, = Theme Session, = Presenter
Activity Number: 516
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Thursday, August 11, 2005 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: General Methodology
Abstract - #304641
Title: Causal Inference for Semiparametric Regression Models Using Higher-order Influence Functions
Author(s): Lingling Li*+
Companies: Harvard University
Address: 86 Newbury Street, Apt. 5, Somerville, MA, 02144, United States
Keywords: causal inference ; semiparametric regression ; higher order influence functions ; doubly robust
Abstract:

Consider the semiparametric regression model E[Y|R,X]=b*R+w(X). R is a dichotomous treatment variable, X is a high-dimensional (say 60) vector of confounders, and w(X) is an unknown function of X. Recent developments in semiparametric theory have lead to doubly robust (DR) estimators for the parameter b. Double robustness guarantees n1/2 consistency (the standard parametric rate) of our estimator for b as a long as (a) there is no unmeasured confounding and (b) either (but not necessarily both) a working model for the propensity score or a working regression model of Y on R and X are correctly specified. DR estimation will fail to be consistent if both (a) and (b) are not sufficiently close to guarantee small bias. We present novel confidence intervals for the treatment effect based on higher-order influence functions. Given any smoothness assumption placed on (a) and (b), our new theory yields valid confidence intervals for the true treatment effect beyond the scope of what DR can achieve; however, we sacrifice n1/2 consistency for slower convergence rates as commonly encountered in nonparametric inference. We present simulation results demonstrating the performance of our method.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2005 program

JSM 2005 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2005