JSM 2005 - Toronto

Abstract #304415

This is the preliminary program for the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2005); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.



The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


The Program has labeled the meeting rooms with "letters" preceding the name of the room, designating in which facility the room is located:

Minneapolis Convention Center = “MCC” Hilton Minneapolis Hotel = “H” Hyatt Regency Minneapolis = “HY”

Back to main JSM 2005 Program page



Legend: = Applied Session, = Theme Session, = Presenter
Activity Number: 445
Type: Topic Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #304415
Title: Variance Estimation for Volunteer Panel Web Surveys Using Propensity Score Adjustment and Calibration Adjustment
Author(s): Sunghee Lee*+ and Richard L. Valliant
Companies: University of California, Los Angeles and University of Michigan
Address: Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angelse, CA, 90024, United States
Keywords: variance estimation ; web surveys ; calibration adjustment ; propensity score weighting
Abstract:

Combination of propensity score adjustment and calibration is shown to reduce bias in volunteer panel Web surveys. This combination first adjusts the design weights correcting for selection bias from nonrandomized sampling through propensity score adjustment and re-adjusts these adjusted weights correcting for coverage bias through calibration. Therefore, the final set of weights is comprised of multiple components, and the estimator no longer takes a linear form. When these adjustments are jointly used, there is no clear approach for deriving variance. This study will compare three variance estimation methods for the adjusted estimates through simulation. The first method resembles what commercial statistical software uses. The second approach uses the variance estimator in Deville and Särndal modified from the asymptotic variance estimator for the generalized regression estimator. The third method will derive variance using jackknife replication method. Variance estimates from these approaches will be compared to the simulation variances, and their coverage rates of the nominal confidence intervals will be examined with the magnitude of bias reduction achieved by the adjustment.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2005 program

JSM 2005 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2005