JSM 2005 - Toronto

Abstract #304311

This is the preliminary program for the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2005); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.



The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


The Program has labeled the meeting rooms with "letters" preceding the name of the room, designating in which facility the room is located:

Minneapolis Convention Center = “MCC” Hilton Minneapolis Hotel = “H” Hyatt Regency Minneapolis = “HY”

Back to main JSM 2005 Program page



Legend: = Applied Session, = Theme Session, = Presenter
Activity Number: 35
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Sunday, August 7, 2005 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: General Methodology
Abstract - #304311
Title: Penalized Likelihood Principal Component Rotation
Author(s): Trevor Park*+
Companies: University of Florida
Address: 103 Griffin Floyd Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States
Keywords: principal components ; rotation ; penalized likelihood ; varimax ; functional data
Abstract:

Principal component analysis provides a ready exploratory tool for high-dimensional data, particularly functional data, when a priori models are unavailable. The objective is to assign interpretations to the components that provide intuition and serve as a guide for further exploration. Principal components based on small samples are subject to high sampling variation that can obscure straightforward interpretations. Ad hoc techniques such as varimax rotation can enhance interpretability at the possible expense of losing fidelity to the data. Using rotation criteria instead as penalty functions in a maximum penalized likelihood setting has several advantages, including providing a smooth continuum of possible rotations, preferentially rotating components that are poorly defined, and creating a way to measure fidelity of rotated components to the data. The computational challenges inherent in this technique have been alleviated by recent developments in algorithms for optimization subject to orthogonality constraints.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2005 program

JSM 2005 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2005