JSM 2005 - Toronto

Abstract #304035

This is the preliminary program for the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2005); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.



The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


The Program has labeled the meeting rooms with "letters" preceding the name of the room, designating in which facility the room is located:

Minneapolis Convention Center = “MCC” Hilton Minneapolis Hotel = “H” Hyatt Regency Minneapolis = “HY”

Back to main JSM 2005 Program page



Legend: = Applied Session, = Theme Session, = Presenter
Activity Number: 405
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #304035
Title: Compensating for Noncoverage of Nontelephone Households Using the National Health Interview Survey
Author(s): Karen Davis*+ and Meena Khare
Companies: National Center for Health Statistics and National Center for Health Statistics
Address: 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD, 20782, United States
Keywords: noncoverage ; propensity score model
Abstract:

Telephone survey estimates are subject to bias from noncoverage of nontelephone households. To compensate for such bias, sampling weights typically are adjusted using ratio adjustments to match the demographics of the population, weight adjustments of households with interruptions in telephone service to account for nontelephone households, or weight adjustments of telephone households based on logistic regression estimates of the propensity for each household to have been without service. The interruption method assumes that characteristics of telephone households reporting interruptions in telephone service during the previous year are more similar to nontelephone households than to households with continuous service. The propensity score methods indirectly make a similar assumption, because the probability of being a nontelephone household is often predicated by whether the household had service interruptions. Using the 2001--2003 National Health Interview Surveys, we will use the interruption method and propensity score method to develop sampling weights for telephone households and show how adjustments based on interruption in phone service can reduce bias.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2005 program

JSM 2005 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2005