JSM 2005 - Toronto

Abstract #304029

This is the preliminary program for the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2005); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.



The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


The Program has labeled the meeting rooms with "letters" preceding the name of the room, designating in which facility the room is located:

Minneapolis Convention Center = “MCC” Hilton Minneapolis Hotel = “H” Hyatt Regency Minneapolis = “HY”

Back to main JSM 2005 Program page



Legend: = Applied Session, = Theme Session, = Presenter
Activity Number: 365
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #304029
Title: Combining Information from Multiple Modes to Evaluate and Reduce Nonresponse Bias
Author(s): Mick Couper*+ and Andy Peytchev and Roderick J. Little and Victor Strecher and Kendra Rothert
Companies: University of Michigan and University of Michigan and University of Michigan and University of Michigan and Kaiser Permanente
Address: 3193 Lakewood Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, United States
Keywords: Survey nonresponse ; Web survey ; Nonresponse bias
Abstract:

Approximately 4,000 subjects were recruited for a randomized controlled trial of an online weight management intervention. Participants were sent invitations to web survey reassessments after 3, 6, and 12 months following enrollment. Increasing nonresponse to the three followup surveys created the potential for nonresponse bias in key program outcomes, with only 15% of baseline subjects completing the 12-month survey. A subsample of the 12-month nonrespondents was selected for a nonresponse study. This subsample was randomly assigned to a short telephone or mail survey to explore differences in cost-effectiveness, response rates, and measurement errors between modes. Response rates of 59% for telephone and 56% for mail were achieved. This paper reports on the use of imputation methods to combine the data from the mail and telephone followup surveys, with respondent data from baseline and the earlier followup surveys, to construct a synthetic dataset of responses to the 12-month survey.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2005 program

JSM 2005 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2005