JSM 2005 - Toronto

Abstract #303606

This is the preliminary program for the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2005); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.



The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


The Program has labeled the meeting rooms with "letters" preceding the name of the room, designating in which facility the room is located:

Minneapolis Convention Center = “MCC” Hilton Minneapolis Hotel = “H” Hyatt Regency Minneapolis = “HY”

Back to main JSM 2005 Program page



Legend: = Applied Session, = Theme Session, = Presenter
Activity Number: 96
Type: Topic Contributed
Date/Time: Monday, August 8, 2005 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #303606
Title: Using Data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) To Assess the Effectiveness of Nonresponse Adjustment in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
Author(s): Lap-Ming Wun*+ and Trena M. Ezzati-Rice and Ralph DiGaetano and Huseyin Goksel and Hongsheng Hao
Companies: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Westat and Westat and Westat
Address: 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD, 20850, United States
Keywords: bias ; nonresponse ; logistic regression ; interaction ; weight adjustment ; propensity score
Abstract:

The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) is a large, complex survey sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The MEPS, like most sample surveys, experiences unit nonresponse. Adjusting weights to compensate for unit nonresponse is a common practice in large surveys. A major goal of the adjustment is to reduce bias in survey estimates. Generally, the "true" value of variables of interest is not known, so it is not possible to assess the effectiveness of the nonresponse adjustment in reducing potential bias. Each year, a new sample for the MEPS is drawn from respondents to the previous year's National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). A sample weight from NHIS is the initial base weight for the MEPS sample. Adjustment for MEPS dwelling unit nonresponse is made to this initial weight. Through the linkage of the NHIS and MEPS, we can determine the "true" value for variables of interest for all NHIS households sampled for the MEPS (i.e., prior to incurring nonresponse). Then, after adjustments for MEPS nonresponse, we can examine which adjustments came closest to the "true" values. In this paper, we investigate alternative adjustment methods.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2005 program

JSM 2005 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2005