JSM 2005 - Toronto

Abstract #302966

This is the preliminary program for the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2005); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.



The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


The Program has labeled the meeting rooms with "letters" preceding the name of the room, designating in which facility the room is located:

Minneapolis Convention Center = “MCC” Hilton Minneapolis Hotel = “H” Hyatt Regency Minneapolis = “HY”

Back to main JSM 2005 Program page



Legend: = Applied Session, = Theme Session, = Presenter
Activity Number: 72
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Sunday, August 7, 2005 : 4:00 PM to 5:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Statistics in Epidemiology
Abstract - #302966
Title: Comparing Smoothing Techniques for Modeling Exposure-response Curves in Cox Models
Author(s): Donna Spiegelman and Usha S. Govindarajulu*+ and Ellen Eisen
Companies: Harvard School of Public Health and Harvard School of Public Health and Harvard School of Public Health
Address: 677 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA, 02115,
Keywords: penalized spline ; fractional polynomial ; smoothing ; restricted cubic spline ; Cox model ; dose-response
Abstract:

To allow for a nonlinear exposure-response relationship, we applied flexible nonparametric techniques (smoothing) to model time to lung cancer mortality in two occupational cohorts. We focused on three smoothing techniques in Cox models: penalized splines, restricted cubic splines, and fractional polynomials. We compared standard software implementations of these methods based on visual representation (curve fitting), criteria for model selection, and degrees of freedom. We propose a quantitative measure of the difference between a pair of curves based on the area between them. The between-curves-area was calculated up to selected quantiles of the exposure distribution and expressed as percentages of the total area difference. The relative performance of the three methods differed across the range of exposure. he three dose-response curves were similar where the exposure data were dense. The methods were less similar over the sparse regions of high exposure. The disparity was more obvious in one of the two examples, where the fractional polynomial differed from the other two splines by providing a more local fit to the extreme values.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2005 program

JSM 2005 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2005