JSM 2005 - Toronto

Abstract #302890

This is the preliminary program for the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2005); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.



The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


The Program has labeled the meeting rooms with "letters" preceding the name of the room, designating in which facility the room is located:

Minneapolis Convention Center = “MCC” Hilton Minneapolis Hotel = “H” Hyatt Regency Minneapolis = “HY”

Back to main JSM 2005 Program page



Legend: = Applied Session, = Theme Session, = Presenter
Activity Number: 239
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 9, 2005 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #302890
Title: Darkness Made Visible: Field Management and Nonresponse in the 2004 SCF
Author(s): Arthur Kennickell*+
Companies: Federal Reserve Board
Address: Mail Stop 153, Washington, DC, 20551, United States
Keywords: Nonresponse ; Interviewers
Abstract:

Survey nonresponse in field surveys is the joint outcome of the decision of survey staff to apply effort to inform and persuade respondents and the evaluation of such inputs by respondents. In most surveys, the field staff are under great pressure to produce completed interviews. Thus, as discussed in Kennickell [2004], they have an incentive to apply effort to cases that are most likely, in their view, to be completed with least effort. When the respondent characteristics involved in this evaluation are correlated with variables of interest in the survey, bias results unless a means can be found of discovering and adjusting for the underlying behavioral structures. But, absent constraints on the behavior of interviewers, the observed outcomes are contaminated by the endogeneity of effort---and only strong a priori assumptions could disentangle the interviewer effects from the respondent effects. To address this issue, the 2004 Survey of Consumer Finances introduced a phased plan of sample management to make effort more nearly exogenous through the first two of three phases of field work.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2005 program

JSM 2005 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2005