JSM 2005 - Toronto

Abstract #303402

This is the preliminary program for the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2005); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.



The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


The Program has labeled the meeting rooms with "letters" preceding the name of the room, designating in which facility the room is located:

Minneapolis Convention Center = “MCC” Hilton Minneapolis Hotel = “H” Hyatt Regency Minneapolis = “HY”

Back to main JSM 2005 Program page



Legend: = Applied Session, = Theme Session, = Presenter
Activity Number: 274
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 9, 2005 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #303402
Title: Bayesian Adjustments for Nonignorable Nonresponse in an Incomplete Two-way Categorical Table
Author(s): Boseung Choi*+ and YouSung Park
Companies: Korea University and Korea University
Address: Dept. of Statistics, 1 5-ka Anam-Dong, Seoul, , South Korea
Keywords: Multi-way contingency table ; Non-ignorable ; non-response ; Empirical bayesian methods ; Priors ; EM algorithm
Abstract:

We consider a two-way contingency table with nonignorable nonresponse. There are fully classified counts, partially classified counts, and unclassified counts. The partially classified counts often are presented as row and column supplemental margins and called item nonresponse, whereas the unclassified counts are presented in total and called unit nonresponse. When the response mechanism obeys nonignorable nonresponse in a categorical data analysis, the maximum likelihood estimation often yields boundary solutions where the probability of nonresponse is estimated at zero in some cells. To overcome this boundary solution problem, we propose five empirical Bayesian methods by imposing five priors on cell probabilities. The five priors reflect how much the response mechanism between respondents and nonrespondents is different. The five empirical Bayesian methods include the previous studies with a one-way contingency table for special cases. We illustrate the five methods with data on a pre-election survey for the November 1998 Buckeye State Poll. Simulation studies investigate the performance of the five methods and compare them with ML estimation.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2005 program

JSM 2005 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2005