JSM 2005 - Toronto

Abstract #302903

This is the preliminary program for the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2005); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.



The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


The Program has labeled the meeting rooms with "letters" preceding the name of the room, designating in which facility the room is located:

Minneapolis Convention Center = “MCC” Hilton Minneapolis Hotel = “H” Hyatt Regency Minneapolis = “HY”

Back to main JSM 2005 Program page



Legend: = Applied Session, = Theme Session, = Presenter
Activity Number: 365
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #302903
Title: An Evaluation of Respondent Selection Methods for Household Mail Surveys
Author(s): Michael Battaglia*+ and Michael W. Link and Martin R. Frankel and Pamela Giambo and Ali H. Mokdad
Companies: Abt Associates, Inc. and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Abt Associates, Inc. and Abt Associates, Inc. and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Address: 55 Wheeler Street, Cambridge, MA, 02474, United States
Keywords: Respondent selection ; Mail surveys ; Random-digit-dialing surveys ; Response rates
Abstract:

Few empirical studies have assessed the effectiveness of techniques for random selection of respondents within households in mail surveys of the general public. Much of the literature in this area focuses on list sample mail surveys, where a respondent's identity often is known ahead of time. Less is known about respondent selection in mail surveys where household composition is largely unknown. As part of a larger assessment of alternatives to random-digit dialed (RDD) telephone surveys, a six-state pilot study was conducted in conjunction with the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), testing the utility of a mail survey using a random sample of residential addresses. Three alternative respondent selection techniques were tested: 1) the next birthday method, 2) collection of data from all eligible adults in the household, and 3) a nonprobability approach in which household members selected one adult to complete the questionnaire. A telephone followup was conducted with a subsample of households to assess compliance with respondent selection rules. The analysis compares response rates, respondent demographics, and compliance assessment across the three groups.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2005 program

JSM 2005 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2005