JSM 2005 - Toronto

Abstract #302541

This is the preliminary program for the 2005 Joint Statistical Meetings in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2005); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.



The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


The Program has labeled the meeting rooms with "letters" preceding the name of the room, designating in which facility the room is located:

Minneapolis Convention Center = “MCC” Hilton Minneapolis Hotel = “H” Hyatt Regency Minneapolis = “HY”

Back to main JSM 2005 Program page



Legend: = Applied Session, = Theme Session, = Presenter
Activity Number: 251
Type: Invited
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 9, 2005 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: General Methodology
Abstract - #302541
Title: Defining and Estimating Intervention Effects for Groups Who Will Develop an Auxiliary Outcome
Author(s): Marshall M. Joffe*+
Companies: University of Pennsylvania
Address: 602 Blockley Hall, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6021, USA
Keywords: causal inference ; auxiliary variables
Abstract:

Nephrologists have been frustrated by the lack of a good means to modify the course of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and would like to intervene before the development of ESRD to positively benefit the course of disease after ESRD diagnosis. The notion of the effect of a treatment given before the change in an auxiliary variable (here, ESRD) on subsequent outcomes (e.g., mortality) is surprisingly hard to formalize; the difficulty results from the fact that not all subjects will develop the auxiliary outcome. This presentation considers several ways to formalize the effects: principal stratification, stratification on a single potential auxiliary variable, stratification on an observed auxiliary variable, and stratification on expected levels auxiliary variables. In this paper, we consider estimation of each of these effects and compare the usefulness of the estimands for understanding causal processes and for decisionmaking. Throughout, we use the nephrology study to motivate and guide our methodological development.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2005 program

JSM 2005 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2005