JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #302253

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 261
Type: Topic Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: Section on Statistics and the Environment
Abstract - #302253
Title: Classification Approaches for Modeling Animal Species Distributions
Author(s): Thomas C. Edwards*+
Companies: Utah State University
Address: Utah Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit, Logan, UT, 84322-5290,
Keywords: classification models ; species presence absence ; gap analysis ; conservation planning
Abstract:

Classification techniques are powerful tools for modeling linkages of animal species with habitat type, especially when coupled with spatially explicit environmental data structures. Unfortunately, a common problem confronting such models is adequate presence absence data for model building. Too often absence data, irrespective of whether collected from a design or purposive-based approach, are lacking, essentially eliminating the application of classification tools for modeling purposes. Several different approaches exist for generating so called "pseudo-absence" data, each with its own assumptions and resultant impacts on the final classification models. I evaluate the effect of two different approaches for generating "pseudo-absence" data on resultant animal distribution models, comparing: (1) random absences generated from within the known range of collected presence data, and (2) a weighted approach based on density isoclines of presence data. Example species for analysis and evaluation come from the Utah Gap Analysis data structure, as well as other environmental data structures used in ongoing conservation planning.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004