JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #302145

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 80
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Monday, August 9, 2004 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Section on Statistical Computing
Abstract - #302145
Title: Statistical Quasi-Newton: A New Look at Least Change
Author(s): Scott Vander Wiel*+ and Chuanhai Liu
Companies: Bell Laboratories and Texas A&M University
Address: Rm 2C-2767, Murray Hill, NJ, 07023,
Keywords: BFGS ; DFP ; negative Broyden family ; Wishart model
Abstract:

A new quasi-Newton method is derived by modeling curvature uncertainty with a Wishart distribution and by following a certain least change principle to determine a Hessian estimate that preserves accuracy across iterations. The new update is in the Broyden class but uses a negative parameter, outside the convex range usually regarded as the "safe-zone'' for Broyden updates. Although Newton steps based on this update tend to be too long, optimal step sizes can be estimated from the Wishart model. In numerical comparisons to BFGS, the new algorithm converges with about 20% fewer iterations and gradient evaluations and about 10% fewer function evaluations on a suite of standard test functions. Our statistical framework provides a simple way to understand differences among various Broyden updates such as BFGS and DFP and shows that these methods do not preserve Hessian accuracy. In fact, BFGS, DFP and all other updates with non-negative Broyden parameters tend to inflate Hessian estimates. Numerical results on three new test functions validate these conclusions.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004